I do apologise for the length, but stay with me, experience these controversial bloggers, their achievements and shortcomings.
Rant-a-view, a catchy title, encapsulating their post well. The use of the fish in their title is somewhat arbitrary, but different, as they choose to be. Put on your reading glasses you older folk who want to read about the controversies, because the predominantly black text on blue background will leave you squinting. http://tinyurl.com/yfuxcll
Juxtaposed to the attention-grabbing, enjoyable, well written posts is the tediously long group post – “a memorandum”. It’s like reading through the small print on an indemnity form. Wading through, I found some good points: To open up the blog to anyone interested in media, instead of journalists. They hit their target audience of 18-23 year olds, using the immediate nature of Facebook for advertising.
Onto the bloggers. Greeneggsandspam: an excellent profile, precisely written. One can feel his alternative, goal orientated nature. Did he reach those goals? He constantly blogged about news stories…which ended up being just that, a news story. The news value dropped due to incorrect spelling. The use of swearing hinted that an appropriate adjective did not come to mind many a time. In “Something New to Do” he suddenly changed his register, slang words were thrown around in a “hey bru” vibe. Not a compelling “first time” story.
Space Cake stays true to his name. “A Sudden Realisation” by him, was what many realised a while ago. It was a good attempt to portray his findings; however he came off as looking a bit behind the times. He tells, instead of shows. “A New Truth for a New Day” is a common view, expressed in an average post. This being said, the end paragraph is powerful and truthful, his true opinions rise to the surface and participate with the audience.
Chocolate Thunder: “This Blogger claims to be Inappropriate”. The controversial nature strikes and catches the eye. Her metaphors are incredible and provoking (“Is this thing on?”). Her tongue-in-cheek humour keeps things light, but witty. “Uncensored knowledge is just a click away” she stated. She has got my attention for as long as I pursue the quest of honest journalism.
Minnie Doughnut has a rather serious blog. It is almost a gloss over blog. Her metaphor of journalism as a cake falls flat. Her sentences tend to flow into each other like lazy ripples on a river. The stone throw of contrversiality is there – but it does not make successful ripples. “Pants or No Pants: Could Sisterhood be a Myth” however, was very truthful and powerful, with great use of image. (http://www.mushypeasontoast.blogspot.com/)